
Posted by
chebtastic1
on 2008-01-30 18:57:15 |
 |
 |
|
 |
I always say that race, gender etc are what you are, not who you are...who you are is like you said, your emotional characteristics, the things that make you unique and special.
Thanks for posting this xxx |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |

Posted by
werebait
on 2008-02-01 08:46:21 |
 |
 |
|
 |
| cheb is rigth that exercise just showed how materialistic they are |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |

Posted by
yadokta
on 2008-02-02 06:34:50 |
 |
 |
|
 |
| this seems to me tobe a usa thing as in the uk we don't do this sort of labeling. but to put simply "human" is an expected responce to me i would have put "mabehuman"! but you only answer to be different don't you? if you though that you were a nerd put jock because a nerd is an athlete in maths and the sciences yes? if you thought you were a jock then put nerd as you would be so passionate about sport you were a nerd possibly knowing lots of game scores verging on autism. as for putting any religion as a definition of charactor that is just realy sad, how can a person alow themselves tobe in this catorgory? |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |

Posted by
werebait
on 2008-02-03 21:44:48 |
 |
 |
|
 |
| yadokta found some nice loopholes |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |

Posted by
walruskid
on 2008-02-04 11:26:26 |
 |
 |
|
 |
| yes i agree. his comment is very good, but my main point was that none of those characteristics even matter. the only important thing is the fact that you are human. to me, "nerd" and "jock" are just stupid tearms to spereate people into groups. its worthless. |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |