Sign Up |  Login

     
 
    My Blog |  Popular Posts |  Top 100 Blogs |  Recent Blogs |  Random Blogs |  Write a Blog |  Manage Categories  
   View Blog
 Thompson upstaged by Giuliani, Romney

WASHINGTON -- Fred Thompson emerged Tuesday from weeks of preparation for his first presidential debate, but largely watched from the sidelines as rivals Mitt Romney and Rudolph W. Giuliani clashed over who can return the party to its fiscally conservative roots.

Thompson, a former senator from Tennessee best known as a TV and movie actor, did not officially enter the race until last month. On the stage of a theater in Dearborn, Mich., he sought to allay concerns that he lacked the drive and preparation to run for president.

Thompson appeared nervous in the debate's opening moments. But he displayed flashes of humor as the two-hour forum on economic policy, sponsored by CNBC, MSNBC and the Wall Street Journal, drew to a close. A debate transcript is available here.

By and large, the nine men seeking the GOP nomination echoed one another in calling for restraint in taxes, spending and government regulation.

But Romney, a former governor of Massachusetts, took on Giuliani over his fiscal record as New York mayor. That, in turn, led Giuliani to criticize Romney more harshly than before.

"I led, he lagged," Giuliani said, insisting that he was more vigorous than Romney in cutting both taxes and spending.

The competition to establish their bona fides as champions of fiscal discipline comes as Republicans are struggling to regain the edge they once held on economic issues. Recent polls have found that Americans favor Democrats for dealing with the deficit, federal spending, taxes and the economy.

Michigan, hit hard by foreign trade and a beleaguered auto industry, is emblematic of an awkward reality for the GOP: Even though the economy is strong by many measures, including the booming stock market, many voters remain uneasy about the future, and large parts of the manufacturing sector are struggling.

All the Democratic candidates have made sure to address voters' economic concerns. On Tuesday, the Republicans split over whether to view the state of the economy as a glass half full or half empty.

Brimming with optimism, Thompson said, "Not enough has been done to tell what some call the greatest story never told, and that is that we are enjoying a period of growth right now."

But other candidates warned that a Pollyanna outlook risked seeming out of touch.

"A lot of people are going to be watching this debate. They're going to hear Republicans on this stage talk about how great the economy is," said former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee. "And frankly, when they hear that, they're going to probably reach for the dial."

The dispute between Romney and Giuliani over their credentials as fiscal disciplinarians reflects in part the pressure on them to restore the confidence of economic conservatives, who have been disillusioned by the growth in federal spending since President Bush took office.

Romney also faulted Giuliani for filing a lawsuit to overturn the line-item veto that Congress passed under President Clinton. Ultimately, the Supreme Court agreed with Giuliani, who on Tuesday called the measure unconstitutional and said it would have deprived New York of badly needed funds.

"I don't think it's a bad idea to have a Republican presidential candidate who actually has beat President Clinton at something," Giuliani said.

Tensions between Romney and Giuliani escalated as Thompson was seeking to establish his position in the crowded and highly unsettled Republican contest.

For the most part, Thompson did not stray from party orthodoxy, hailing the virtues of small government and free trade. He also called attention to long-term problems with Social Security and Medicare, both of which face insolvency with the forthcoming retirement of the baby-boom generation.

He suggested that one option for preserving Social Security would be to slow the growth of benefits by pegging annual benefit increases to the inflation rate.

All in all, Thompson "gave solid answers, though he said nothing to stir the Republican soul," said political scientist John J. Pitney Jr. of Claremont McKenna College. "He beat low expectations and fell short of high ones."

On foreign policy, the candidates disagreed over whether a president would need the approval of Congress to take military action against nuclear facilities in Iran.

Source :

www.ielection08.com 

    Posted by uselection on 2007-10-11 00:50:27 | Rating: | Views: 65
  Email This to a Friend  

  Bookmark:
Permalink:  
   Blog Comments
  
America's Foreign Policy needs to be more stern. We need to stand up, if somebody does in fact pose an immediate threat to our Country then the President should not be required to consult with anybody. As for Mitt Romney, Lawyers? This guy is a moron.
Posted by  JTEllis  on 2007-10-11 05:41:01 
Would you like to comment?

    (Maximum characters: 5000)
    You have characters left.
  
  Security code:  
                        
                         Refresh Image
                         
  Blog Information
 

uselection
tehran, Iran, Islamic Republic of

Latest Posts

 ترفندي براي...
 راهنمای...
 Iraq, Health Care...
 Republicans Again on...
 Is the US election...

uselection's Links

 euro cup...
 انجمن...
 وبسای...

Blog Categories

 Nothing found

Blog Archive

 February 2008 (2)
 October 2007 (16)
 September 2007 (5)

Comment Archives

 November 2007 (1)
 October 2007 (1)