This is my attempt to make my blogs more accessible to those who want to read them. I have been blogging for a little while now and have found some blogs garner high viwership, but few response, so I am hopin this will be thplace to make that easier for people who have requested an easier way to view and respond.
My blogs are usually a mix of of the two things that people always say you should not discuss, religion and politics. I throw in my two cents worth on many topics, but some are more red than others. I get no responses and so it is hard sometimes to know what people are thinking or how they feel. I know not everyone who reads my blogs will agree witht hem, but i hope to sway the occasional individual to think like me. I am not always right, but on my principles i will not sway.
I will start by rerunning some previous blogs to gauge what sparks the most interest, not that i care, but it is good to know your audience.
The first one i will publish will be a series i call Gorebull warming. Oh by the way you are dealing with an independant conservative christian who grew up and was trained up in the Reagan years, so beware. No, I am not a republican mouthpiece, i am not a Rush wannabe, in factwhen Rush came on the air I thought, 'wow someone else thinks like i do'.
The difference is while rush is in his arena and his commercial profits and blind loyalty sway him, i am more of the ilk to go after anyone in either party and I don't pull punches for either side.
so read on
Gen 2:5 And every plant of the field before it was in the earth, and every herb of the field before it grew: for the LORD God had not caused it to rain upon the earth, and [there was] not a man to till the ground.
Gen 2:6 But there went up a mist from the earth, and watered the whole face of the ground.
Gen 7:10 And it came to pass after seven days, that the waters of the flood were upon the earth.
Gen 7:11 In the six hundredth year of Noah's life, in the second month, the seventeenth day of the month, the same day were all the fountains of the great deep broken up, and the windows of heaven were opened.
Gen 7:12 And the rain was upon the earth forty days and forty nights.
Gen 8:2 The fountains also of the deep and the windows of heaven were stopped, and the rain from heaven was restrained;
Gen 8:3 And the waters returned from off the earth continually: and after the end of the hundred and fifty days the waters were abated.
Gen 8:4 And the ark rested in the seventh month, on the seventeenth day of the month, upon the mountains of Ararat.
Gen 8:5 And the waters decreased continually until the tenth month: in the tenth [month], on the first [day] of the month, were the tops of the mountains seen.
Gen 8:6 And it came to pass at the end of forty days, that Noah opened the window of the ark which he had made:
Gen 8:7 And he sent forth a raven, which went forth to and fro, until the waters were dried up from off the earth.
Gen 8:8 Also he sent forth a dove from him, to see if the waters were abated from off the face of the ground;
Gen 8:9 But the dove found no rest for the sole of her foot, and she returned unto him into the ark, for the waters [were] on the face of the whole earth: then he put forth his hand, and took her, and pulled her in unto him into the ark.
Gen 8:10 And he stayed yet other seven days; and again he sent forth the dove out of the ark;
Gen 8:11 And the dove came in to him in the evening; and, lo, in her mouth [was] an olive leaf pluckt off: so Noah knew that the waters were abated from off the earth.
Gen 8:12 And he stayed yet other seven days; and sent forth the dove; which returned not again unto him any more.
Gen 8:13 And it came to pass in the six hundredth and first year, in the first [month], the first [day] of the month, the waters were dried up from off the earth: and Noah removed the covering of the ark, and looked, and, behold, the face of the ground was dry.
Gen 8:14 And in the second month, on the seven and twentieth day of the month, was the earth dried.
I take a look as I drive and as I have driven around this country and I have seen the mountains and the deserts. I have seen the oceans and the rivers. I have seen the fertile lands and the badlands. I have seen more proof of the flood than I can imagine. I have seen massive canyons that if you just open your eyes you can see where the flood waters flowed. I have seen layer upon layer of the most colorful soils and rocks in one vista or butte and seen something completely different in the neighboring landscape. Only flood waters receding could lead to such things.
There are places here in Arizona where you can see for miles and miles the layer of rock which was once soft swirled mud. The way the different buttes and mesas formed as the waters receded off of them, the erosion patterns that still carry water to this day when it rains. The monuments of monument valley with their rocks piled underneath them, where the waters left them and where they land as old fissures continue to wear away.
I don't know if you know what hydrological sorting is, but it is the process that formed the earth today. The layers the evolutionists call their timelines are merely how the earths surface reshaped and formed as the waters abated. The basalt lava and other lava fields you find in New Mexico are another wonderful result of the flood. To see the lava flows between Grants and Alamogordo is an eye opening experience.
So, why all this about creation? Why all this about the floods? It is simple. The reason is this, you either believe in God and His word or you believe in the words of the Baal worshippers. The ones who worship the creation rather than the created. The ones who demand you not only accept their absurd views, but that you accept them without question or be ridiculed or worse.
Rom 1:21 Because that, when they knew God, they glorified [him] not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
Rom 1:22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,
Rom 1:23 And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.
Rom 1:24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves:
Rom 1:25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.
Rom 1:26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:
Rom 1:27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.
Rom 1:28 And even as they did not like to retain God in [their] knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient;
"Those things which are not convenient", such perhaps as "An Inconvenient Truth". The truth in which the science is skewed, the history is ignored and the spur of the moment thought that can gain power and control over the unwashed masses can be controlled. For it is all about power with these people. It is always about power. Man always has the urge to gain power over anything and everything, and even the most righteous man has been tempted and many have fallen over the "will to power" as Nietzsche (sp.) called it.
The power to control the weather, the climate, the environment and the scientists who study it. The people who dare to speak the truth or question the lies lose their tenures, their grants, their jobs and their certifications.
"One person conditioned to rule and control. The media sells it and we play the role." (Crazy Train by Ozzy Osbourne) Very interesting the perception of what is said in this song.
The media pushes the views of an ex-senator, a lawyer, a politician as the truth and never investigates, because he is their man, their savior, their god. The people flock to one man or another and pray upon him for salvation and find instead the insanity of any man seeking power of others. They accept the insanity because they feel good in accepting it. The alternative to accepting the truth is accepting the lie. The lie is comfortable, because the lie allows us to carry on with out guilt, without having to say we are sorry and without having to check our sins at the door.
So, we come up with global warming, because we are damaging their god or in this case their goddess. They even made a cartoon to worship her and to lure the children into worshipping her. Remember "Captain Planet"? So, we ignore the flood. We ignore the tilt of the earth and how it wobbles. We ignore the fact that the polar ice caps really do not belong there. We ignore that scientists have been dead wrong about the ice rings. Look up the story of the P38 squadron lost in Greenland and how deep the ice buried them in 50 years.
I wont say the temps are not a little higher and the summers a little drier, but I will tell you that weather cycles have been around since the days of the flood. I will tell you that the myopic are leading the blind and that one should always investigate for ones self what is going on. Remember if you are my age or older, the next ice age was supposed to be upon us by now. The same scientists who claimed that, are now the global warming idiots.
I will also say that as a man of medical science we deal in absolutes and empirical type data. If The patients result is found to have been off by the percentages that the climatogists found their results to be at, then that would be significant. I guess when you have a political agenda and your skewed data is off and nobody can prove you skewed it on purpose, then perhaps it is as insignificant as you say. The sad thing is that the only world leader I hear out there even questioning all of this is the president of the Czech Republic. If more politicians were like him instead of like the power hungry madmen we are cursed with, perhaps we would have a chance of defeating these idiots before they regulate us into their Marxist socialist 'utopia'.
The water is 28.7 degrees, which is below freezing and can induce hypothermia, and the man swims in excruciating pain for nearly 19 minutes wanting to quit. He dove in between the ice. If there is ice and there is pain because of the extreme cold is that not like shooting yourself in the head and saying see the gun is empty, as your brains come out the other side of your skull?
2Pe 3:3 Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts,
2Pe 3:4 And saying, Where is the promise of his coming? for since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as [they were] from the beginning of the creation.
2Pe 3:5 For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water:
2Pe 3:6 Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished:
2Pe 3:7 But the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men.
Willful ignorance? I was once told willful ignorance is being stupid on purpose. I am guessing that swimming in arctic ice is a good example of willful ignorance. The polar bears, seals, and whales have been doing it for years. The summer ice as they call it has been receding, but then again the ice is not really supposed to be there.
On the other hand the historical records show that the ice in Greenland has increased in the last thousand years, since the times when the Vikings farmed areas where the ice now exists. The convenient misinformation is part of the inconvenient truth. I imagine if these folks had existed at the time the glaciers were receding from Kansas City to Montana and Alaska, they would have warned us of global warming and how we were breathing too much and we all need to shallow breathe to keep the ice.
Weather, as I have said before, goes in cycles. They talk of mini ice ages and I am sure there was after these mini ice ages a bit of warming. I wonder why we allow such 'myopic' views of our history to overtake us as to ignore the weather cycles.
I do not want people to think that I do not believe it is warmer these days. I know it has been warmer, but I also know that their are natural reasons for it. It is not man causing the problems. The ocean currents change, solar fluctuations affect the temps. No one knows what the temp is supposed to be. They can guess, they can wish and dream, but if warmer temps are so bad, then why is everyone moving south.
If they believe in evolution and adaptation, won't man adapt?
In the quest for answers I come up with questions ands in the questions I find quandaries. I will keep searching for the answers.
One entry found for theoretical.
Main Entry: the·o·ret·i·cal
Pronunciation: "thE-&-'re-ti-k&l, "thir-'e-
Variant(s): also the·o·ret·ic /-tik/
Function: adjective
Etymology: Late Latin theoreticus, from Greek theOrEtikos, from theOrein to look at
1 a : relating to or having the character of theory : ABSTRACT b : confined to theory or speculation often in contrast to practical applications : SPECULATIVE
2 : given to or skilled in theorizing theoretical physicist>
3 : existing only in theory : HYPOTHETICAL theoretical situation>
Main Entry: the·o·ry
Pronunciation: 'thE-&-rE, 'thir-E
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural -ries
Etymology: Late Latin theoria, from Greek theOria, from theOrein
1 : the analysis of a set of facts in their relation to one another
2 : abstract thought : SPECULATION
3 : the general or abstract principles of a body of fact, a science, or an art theory>
4 a : a belief, policy, or procedure proposed or followed as the basis of action theory that all children want to learn> b : an ideal or hypothetical set of facts, principles, or circumstances -- often used in the phrase in theory theory, we have always advocated freedom for all>
5 : a plausible or scientifically acceptable general principle or body of principles offered to explain phenomena theory of light>
6 a : a hypothesis assumed for the sake of argument or investigation b : an unproved assumption : CONJECTURE c : a body of theorems presenting a concise systematic view of a subject
synonym see HYPOTHESIS
Main Entry: hy·poth·e·sis
Pronunciation: hI-'pä-th&-s&s
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural hy·poth·e·ses /-"sEz/
Etymology: Greek, from hypotithenai to put under, suppose, from hypo- + tithenai to put -- more at DO
1 a : an assumption or concession made for the sake of argument b : an interpretation of a practical situation or condition taken as the ground for action
2 : a tentative assumption made in order to draw out and test its logical or empirical consequences
3 : the antecedent clause of a conditional statement
synonyms HYPOTHESIS, THEORY, LAW mean a formula derived by inference from scientific data that explains a principle operating in nature. HYPOTHESIS implies insufficient evidence to provide more than a tentative explanation hypothesis explaining the extinction of the dinosaurs>. THEORY implies a greater range of evidence and greater likelihood of truth theory of evolution>. LAW implies a statement of order and relation in nature that has been found to be invariable under the same conditions law of gravitation>.
Main Entry: em·pir·i·cal
Pronunciation: -i-k&l
Variant(s): also em·pir·ic /-ik/
Function: adjective
1 : originating in or based on observation or experience
2 : relying on experience or observation alone often without due regard for system and theory empirical basis for the theory>
3 : capable of being verified or disproved by observation or experiment
4 : of or relating to empiricism
- em·pir·i·cal·ly /-i-k(&-)lE/ adverb
Main Entry: 1fan·ta·sy
Variant(s): also phan·ta·sy /'fan-t&-sE, -zE/
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural -sies
Etymology: Middle English fantasie -- more at FANCY
1 obsolete : HALLUCINATION
2 : FANCY; especially : the free play of creative imagination
3 : a creation of the imaginative faculty whether expressed or merely conceived: as a : a fanciful design or invention b : a chimerical or fantastic notion c : FANTASIA 1 d : imaginative fiction featuring especially strange settings and grotesque characters -- called also fantasy fiction
4 : CAPRICE
5 : the power or process of creating especially unrealistic or improbable mental images in response to psychological need fantasy>; also : a mental image or a series of mental images (as a daydream) so created fantasies of adolescence>
I turned on the television this morning. I woke up way too early, but in doing so I stumbled upon some show about the future of evolution on this planet. Now to recap for you who have not read my blogs before, I do not believe in the Darwinian theory of evolution and I do not describe to the 'Intelligent Design' theory of evolution, which is just a rewording of the Gap theory, which is what suckered early theologians and church leaders into handing this world over to the Satanists. The theory of 'intelligent design' is what I refer to as the "retarded god theory', with credit to Kent Hovind for his lectures on this theory.
The theory of 'intelligent design' and the gap theory both basically acknowledge Darwin's theory of macroevololution, but they believe God had a hand in it. I wonder then why God, who revealed so much of science in the Bible, before scientists ever understood these things, would lie to us about creation. That for those who dispute the Bible and the existence of God is simple. They believe the Bible to be fantasy, a book written to control and placate the masses. For us who believe the Bible it is even simpler, the scientists who dispute the Bible and the evidence all around us is wrong.
The funny thing is, I believe they know in their hearts the Bible is correct, because if they believed the Bible to be nothing but fantasy to placate and control the masses, they would not try to discredit it, so they could use other means to placate and control the masses. They would do like in their fictional movies and put a leader into power that would use the bible to control the masses and control our behavior, but instead they try to control us in other ways. They try to destroy the Bible and the belief in God. They try to replace God with their humanistic views and they try to replace the bible with their text of "science" and politics.
They put on fantasy shows about where the earth will be a "shallow sea" over most of the land and giant future relatives of the man-of-war will sail the seas, with sophisticated navigation abilities and eyes to see there prey and capture it. The time before this the quails will turn into mole like creatures living underground. They can't get the past right, so they try to distort the future. They do not have empirical data to support their theories of evolution of the past, so they just create a future of change, but yet other than minor adaptations they can not show any evolutionary stages in existence. If man came from apes, why do we still have apes? If asteroids wiped out the dinosaurs why do we still have lizards?
Theory is treated as fact. Facts are treated as inconvenient and data is skewed. If you read the previously suggested book, "Bones of Contention", then you will know about the magic wand of evolutionary science. The nearly constant rearranging of evolutionary fossils and the elimination of the inconvenient fossils as 'dead end' of evolution, species of 'humanoids, that just disappeared when they no longer fit into the chart. You would know of bones found miles apart that were placed together and called our early ancestors and from to bones a picture is drawn of an ape-like creature with human feet.
The circular reasoning of the evolutionist is astonishing. We are shown all the layers of dirt and told they represent phases or stages in the earths growth from a ball of molten lava to this farmable land. What did plants grow in before we had the fertile soils of this era as they call their layers of dirt. Was their top soil that turned to rock at the end of each era? I mean we are shown massive vegetarian dinosaurs chewing on giant trees in the pictures, but what did they grow in, was their cell structure so different that they did not need the same basics plants need today? Did their root systems operate differently?
The reason I ask, is because I want to know if the nutrients in the rock layers leached to the top soil we have today or did the top soil climb through the layers of rock and clay to stay on top. Where did the top soil come from? Does it blow around the earth waiting to settle on the next layer of rock that will mysteriously form?
Do you see what I am saying or doing? I am using theory, imagination, hypothesis and empirical information and I am creating all sorts of thoughts in my mind and wonderings. I am questioning based on what I se and what I know. I am doing as many scientists do today with the data they have and I am trying to imagine where all these things came from, but I create more questions than answers. We go back to standing at the Grand Canyon, looking at all the layers of sediment and all this signs of massive water flow and wonder still how that little river did so much damage to all that hard rock.
The soil around the Mississippi, where I grew up, and the rock bluffs are much softer, the river is much larger, yet their is no canyon formed or forming. They effect on the rocks are glacial. The sediment washed down river has yet to be enough to create a canyon or series of canyons from Minnesota to Louisiana and beyond. Why not?
The bible talks of how the earth was before the flood, the bible tells of how the earth was after the flood and I see as do many others the effects of the flood throughout this land and beyond. I took someone through the badlands of South Dakota one time. Did not tell them where we were going and what they would see. The first thing this avid student of geology said was. "this was all underwater." I always wonder how someone could just look at the place and say that. I mean, sure the scientists will theorize tiny floods or large seas in limited areas at different times, but not acknowledge a great flood, for then they would have to acknowledge God.
So, billions of years of evolution which suddenly halts when man appears on the scene in his "modern" form and now we are so intelligent we can theorize all that has happened. We can determine that suddenly we are going to destroy this planet, that by there account has been destroyed and regenerated many times, but suddenly we are the plague upon the earth. Our insignificant selves will destroy this planet. We are causing weather changes that occurred before us and will certainly occur after our generation ceases. If man had only known when fire was created that he sent this world into a tailspin, and if Al Gore had been there to pour water on that fire, we would be ok today.
Man has a desire to rule over his fellow man. The desire to control and feel powerful is in all men. The same as any other temptation it needs to be controlled. People seek leaders, because people do not want responsibility and are lazy. They seek a leader who will feed on that and make their laziness justified. They also seek a leader in man, because man is weak and easily gives in to temptation, so if we have weak leaders who allow us to feel good about our faults, because they have those faults and do not want to be hypocritical leaders, so they allow all temptations to flourish and call them normal, then we will accept them as our leaders our saviors from those who see us as different.
What the will you accept from a leader who allows you to be the lowest form of human you can be? You accept that leader telling all others that they must accept your evils, because you are just being your normal natural self. So you allow them to turn the whole of humanity upside down. You allow them to control you and all who oppose you. You are controlled because you will accept all things they say, because they accept you. They tell you that you are causing global warming, but that is ok, you will do all you can for them, because they allow you to be how nature made you. You won't smoke, because that is bad for you, you will do drugs, because they are harmless.
I know that the way my brain operates, someday even I confuse myself, but in the end it all comes together and makes sense. The thoughts I share with you sometimes go astray, but they all come together in my mind as they have been worked on for years before I ever sat down to blog them, Why I blog them I do not know, I guess because I hope to get more people to truly think about things.
I start off with evolution and end with politics and if I did not connect the dots their are two reasons, it is hard to do in a monolog and it is something I am used to doing in conversations over great lengths of time. I just want people to think, I want people to not live off of 20 second sound bites and to then feel smart because they can say, "Bush sucks" of "Hillary cares" or "Al Gore is right" and all they have to back it up with is a twenty second sound bite, or with, because "he just does", or because "of Iraq", or "she wants to fix healthcare" or it was "hot in Chicago yesterday". I want you to think and then speak, even if you are wrong, I appreciate a thinker, not a sound bite repeater.
Be childlike in your wonderment of what is around you, but do not be childish in how you come to your conclusions. God tells us to muse over things, but we prefer amusements instead. I just want you to think. I want you to research not just what you can read, but what you can see, what you can hear. Be unique in this day and age, think. It is a dying art.
God Bless
Mike
I hope this helps you understand things. all thoughit is like jumping into the middle of a long conversation. I post under the same name at Myspace if you want to read more.
I will post a few more samples of my blogs in the coming days.
I just do not know why some get more reads than others.
I hope by spreading out i will eventually get feedback. Intelligent feedback.
Posted by unclemike68 on 2007-10-21 12:43:18 | Rating: n/a | Views: 106
I'm Irish, living in Ireland, so a lot of the politics are wasted on me. I have to agree though that the weather doesn't seem to have changed that much in my lifetime. Ireland isn't known for having great summers, but I can remember some that were quite remarkable. But then again, so could my mother, and my grandmother. This year was pretty mediocre but we're enjoying unusually high temperatures for October. I have experienced snow at Easter but then again, so did my grandmother. All in all, it hasn't really changed a lot. What has changed is our information. The media allows us to know the weather all over the world, day by day. As a child we only worried about what tomorrow would bring, not about global warming.
As to man desiring to rule other men, history has shown us again and again that old men stay at home and send young men to their deaths. It's a fact.
