Again, an issue that has come up that is important and ends up taking presidence over my Corrupt cops issue. Damn Judges!

To start I want to start with Micheal Flynn who was the town of Cairo's Justice. Lately, Micheal has been getting alot of hype in regards to his electoral canidacy for Greene County Clerk. One newspaper here locally went on to say that his oponent in the primaries was incompitent in her duties. This was gross hypacrasy. I have had the unfortunate pleasure of dealing with Judge Flynn in my capacity as a Veteran's Advocate on two seperate occasions. Both were evictions, one was from an apartment with extensive code violations that deemed the house unfit for human occupancy and the other was a trailor park eviction.

The first issue came up with the trailor park eviction. A tenant and her husband were evicted from a trailor park for enacting their right to sue a landlord for damages because the landlord failed to keep the roadway clear of ice and debris which caused the husband to injure his back and be physically unable to work for a year. The Judge granted the eviction assuming that the premises in question was an apartment not a trailor park. The tenant and her husband lost possesion of their home in regards to the eviction which was valued as a $20,000 down deposit for thier new home. At this time I was requested to help. I wrote up an order for Judicial Review De Novo in regards to the landlords perjury in court. For clarification I should state that the landlord in question is a lawyer in Cairo and has ties to Micheal Flynn which would assumably have made for a conflict of interest, something never told to the tenant or her husband. The Notice was turned in to the court and to the opposing party as is required by state law and was done so infront of the cairo police department. Served by me. The tenants were in the process of eviction (which is in violation of http://www.rentlaw.com/ny/mobilehome.htm. In an effort to hide that his decision was in violation of New York State law and that he, the ruling justice, had knoledgy of this, got rid of said Notice. A copy of said notice was served to Attorney General Elliot Spitzer and filed there as well. This is a clear violation of New York Penal Law § 175.20 which says Tampering with public records in the second degree. A  person  is  guilty  of  tampering with public records in the second degree when, knowing that he does  not  have  the  authority  of  anyone entitled  to  grant  it,  he  knowingly removes,  mutilates,  destroys, conceals, makes a false entry in or falsely alters any record  or  other written instrument filed with, deposited in, or otherwise constituting a record of a public office or public servant.
    Tampering  with  public  records  in  the  second  degree is a Class A misdemeanor.

In an attempt to harras the tenant and her husband, the lanlord sent people into their home through a gate, and ransacked their belongings. The medical documentation that was in regards to the injury were thrown in a garbage bag filled with rancid food from not properly being refrigerated. The Lanlord also cut the security alarm system when they broke in the home and gained illegal entry. At such time, I brought it to the Drunken Greene County Sheriff, Richard Hussey, who interviewed said person who admitted that not only did she do it but one of the sheriffs deputies helped. All in violation of § 140.10 Criminal trespass in the third degree.  A  person  is  guilty of criminal trespass in the third degree when he
knowingly enters or remains  unlawfully  in  a  building  or  upon  real property (a)  which  is  fenced  or  otherwise enclosed in a manner designed to exclude intruders; or (b) where the building is  utilized  as  an  elementary  or  secondary school or a children's overnight camp as defined in section one thousand
three  hundred  ninety-two of the public health law or a summer day camp as defined in section one  thousand  three  hundred  ninety-two  of  the public  health  law  in  violation  of  conspicuously  posted  rules  or regulations governing entry and use thereof; or (c) located within a city with a population in excess of  one  million and  where the building or real property is utilized as an elementary or
secondary school in violation of a personally  communicated  request  to leave the premises from a principal, custodian or other person in charge thereof; or (d)  located  outside  of  a  city  with a population in excess of one million and where the building  or  real  property  is  utilized  as  an
elementary or secondary school in violation of a personally communicated request  to leave the premises from a principal, custodian, school board member or trustee, or other person in charge thereof; or (e) where the  building  is  used  as  a  public  housing  project  in violation  of  conspicuously posted rules or regulations governing entry and use thereof; or (f) where a building is used as a public housing project in  violation of  a  personally  communicated  request  to  leave  the premises from a
housing police officer or other person in charge thereof; or (g) where the property  consists  of  a  right-of-way  or  yard  of  a railroad  or  rapid  transit  railroad  which  has  been  designated and
conspicuously posted as a no-trespass railroad zone, pursuant to section eighty-three-b of the railroad law, by the city or county in which  such property is located. Criminal trespass in the third degree is a class B misdemeanor. Because the sheriffs own deputy was involved this should have created a conflict of interest especially since there was personal knowledge of the person who violated the laws and jurisdiction of the complaint should have passed on to the State Police. This was not the case. The Greene county sheriffs department decided that they would not entertain the valid complaint and dismissed the case. This was a gross missuse of office and position on many of the Officials involved. The Landlord should have been placed under investigation for violations of the proffessional standards by Judge Flynn when he found out about the perjury and should have reheard the case on true legal merrits and not fictitiously altered ones that suite political ends. I hope that Voters see the point of this case.
He tampared with public records and he is running for office to be the custodian of way more. This is not a good Idea.

The second case was a vet and her husband and infant baby. This case was nothing but gross misconduct and incompetance from the start. The tenant's husband called me in regards to a serious environmental hazard. There was a water leak from the exterior roof that had created a mold epidemic in the apartment in question. This was a Saturday or a Sunday so I tried to call up the Cairo Code Inspector. I left a message on the machine giving the tenants phone number and to call back. After this I called up the fire Department and filed a complaint at which time the fire department investigated and told the tenants they should be put up in a hotel until repairs were made as the apartment was uninhabitable. Mold Toxicity has been well documented as a cause for many infant immuno suppresant diseases. The Landlord refused to put the tenants up in a hotel so I bought a tarp and we nailed it to the roof to cover the hole as a temporary solution. This case happened 2 years ago and the hole is still there and so is my tarp. In court the landlord stated that it was not mold that made the apartment uninhabitable but the tenants dog who the tenants had many reciepts proving the dog was professionally groomed monthly. The landlord who was an exterminator by trade then submitted falsafied evidence to the court saying the the demised premesis was needed to be fumigated from the smell of a wet dog. The tenants subsiquently asked for a motion to dismiss on grounds of retaliatory eviction, perjury and lack of personal jurisdiction of the court. It outlined clearly New York State Real Property Law 223b and sited that it was illegal for a landlord to evict a tenant for enacting their rights to make a good faith complaint. This documentation seems to be missing from the case folder. And again Judge Flynn tampers with a public record in violation of New York State Penal Law to cover up his incompitence.

The next Judge that I can clearly state has violated New York State Law and Constitutional Rights is Judge Daniel Lalor. Greene County Justice. Judge Lalor hasn't tampered with any public records but he has violated garaunteed constitutional rights. One case has had a few dynamics involved with it. These violations have not been remedeed and there has been no Judicial attempt to repair the damage of those violations. In November of 2005 Judge Lalor told an individuals Public Defender to tell them to sign the divorce affidavit in order to recieve the make up visitation that was due because the opposing party violated the order of visitation handed down by Judge Lalor. The Judge felt that the continual conflict between the two parties was a burden of the County Family Court and had hoped that with the waiver and consent signed that the divorce would finalize a visitation plan. The opoosing party, as recorded by the court records was continually infuriating the visitation schedule. This alone would constitute a change in custody but because the party's mental health issues there was questions as to the safety and welfare of the children. The court as outlined by the court transcripts clearly stated that the schedule would be so ordered and that the divorce would be processed through by living seperate and apart (seperated). This is not the case. The Divorce was put through under false pretenses after the coercion of the Greene County Family court to sign the waiver and consent in violation of what the court had stated and was witnessed by the clerk, and the law guardian. Just the tip of the ice berge. In February of 2006 Judge Lalor ordered the parties to undergo mental health evaluations. According to New York States Constitution, Mental health evaluations are an important step in terminating parentla rights and there for a party has a fudiciary right to court appointed compitent councel. Upon request of cout appointed council, the party was denied counsel by Judge Lalor and the party was told to submit to said evaluations or be held in contempt. All a violation of Article 1 subsection 6 of the New York State Constitution. Court appearences where supposed to take place and the law guardian came to the party in front of multiple witnesses and stated that Judge Lalor had adjourned the case for another date. Four days later the party recieved an order from the court taking the parties visitation time from their children without having heard the merrits of the case. The Judge didnt even have the law guardian present. The meeting was just Judge Lalor and attorney Angelo Scatturro. This was a clear violation of both parties rights even though the opposing parties councel did obtain their desire. Upon asking for Judicial review of the issuance Judge Lalor stated he has the power and authority to tell a person what rights they get and what rights they dont. Thats a load of diaper squash. It is our state legislators who confer our rights as humans and as citizens of this once great state. No Judge has the right to take any individuals rights away. This case is the only one I have first hand knowledge of but I had heard in front of the court many other cases against the local Judges. Judges are supposed to follow the Cannons of Conduct and Ethics. If a Judge cant do that he or she needs to step down so that someone who is Honorable in all the sense of the word can fill that position.

Last but not least, Judge VanWoeart from the 4th Judicial District Princetown. As a Veterans Advocate I filed a few Motions to Justice VanWoeart and she has refused to look at any of them. The 4th Judicial District Chief Justice's office has stated that they feel the motions should be entertained properly by Justice Vanwoeart but refuse to exert their authority in regards to this blatant disregard to a defendants rights by the Town of Princetown Court. The instrument that charges the defendant is defective by the commisionars standards and there was a motion to dismiss. The Information charging the defendant does not state the crime in a concise manner that would cause no leverage for double jeapordy there by making the supporting deposition defective and dismissable. The defendant suffers from mental disabilities and had requested a court appointed attorney under the americans with disabilities act and was denied verbally and in writing. Justice VanWoeart needs to be impartial and needs to start acting impartial in proceedings in her court. It is unfair to the people to be treated with less dignity and respect than they deserve. Cops are falliable, just read the next article. Justices need to start treating people and cops as equals not as diferentiated in a cast system. 

Hold your Judges accountable. You give them the power and you can take that power away. Make sure you vote for someone who will want to serve for justice and not personal gain.