If there are courts -- judicial assemblies -- with jurisdiction, and authorized to apply the
law to some concrete case or other, then there must also be a parliament, or a congress
-- legislative assemblies -- with recognized jurisdiction, and a mandate to author the
law.
 



We have state-regulated capitalism.  Can there be a a self-regulated capitalism, on
the model of, say, a laissez-faire and free-market capitalism?  Would a so-called
anarcho-capitalist ideal really turn out to be as authoritarian as really-existing state-
regulated capitalism? 

There are those who believe that a social-democratic arrangement must necessarily
be a statist arrangement.  The governed and organized anarcho-capitalism some
advocate must be a tyrannical statist arrangement.  The democratically-governed and
collectively-organized anarcho-communism I advocate must necessarily be a self-
governed and socially-organized arrangement.




If there are courts, and if there are laws, then is there necessarily a political state?





Any research that is funded by a profiteering corporation simply cannot be trusted as
being a sound scientific study.