Sign Up |  Login

     
 
    My Blog |  Popular Posts |  Top 100 Blogs |  Recent Blogs |  Random Blogs |  Write a Blog |  Manage Categories |  New Members |  Comments  
   View Blog
 
 Dispassionate Disconnect
From My Perspective - - -

Being ignored, mistreated, disregarded, seen as inconsequential, or treated in a non-sequitur manner – leaves one on the edge of frustration, despair, hopelessness, and utter disenfranchisement. This sense and experience can happen when the AARP sends out a letter stating: “Over the last several months, AARP has fought hard for crucial components of health reform that will improve the health and lives of our members and their families. The House of Representatives will vote on a final bill this week that includes key priorities for older Americans. That's why we've chosen to support the legislation about to be voted on by the House – AFFORDABLE HEALTH CARE FOR AMERICA ACT. We believe it protects and strengthens Medicare, and ensures that your care will never take a back seat to insurance companies' profits.” Someone indignantly responded to the AARP with the following words: “You DID NOT take a stand for me - you have misrepresented the Senior Citizens of this nation! How dare YOU SAY that YOU represented me - YOU have not listened to the Senior Citizens and do not care what they think!” News Releases indicate that AARP and the American Medical Association are both endorsing the Health Care For America Act.

The Dispassionate Disconnect occurs when the 53% who pay taxes do not get a receptive audience, whereas the 43% who pay No Federal Tax become the reference darlings of the Redistribution of Wealth Elected Officials presently in Congress. There are many who have paid Federal Taxes all of their adult lives who now observe a nation recklessly increasing spending to a level that will produce a National Debt that will be impossible to pay down or reduce. The United States Department of the Treasury has an informative Web Site on The History of Taxation. One of the many interesting paragraphs indicates: “By 1913, 36 States had ratified the 16th Amendment to the Constitution. In October, Congress passed a new Income Tax law with rates beginning at 1 percent and rising to 7 percent for taxpayers with income in excess of $500,000. Less than 1 percent of the population paid income tax at the time. Form 1040 was introduced as the standard tax reporting form and, though changed in many ways over the years, remains in use today.” The Tax Policy Center (a joint venture of the Urban Institute and the Brookings Institution) writes about the overall disparity in current Tax Law: “…between 43% and 49% of the American population pays no income tax and a substantial number actually receive negative income tax federal payouts…In 2009 approximately 47% of single filers, 38% of joint filers, and 72% of heads of households will pay no federal income taxes.”

Some years ago, a clever saying was made into Jewelry (WWJD). The saying  asked about life’s situations and contacts: “What Would Jesus Do?” We know what Jesus would do – and what he wants us to do - in terms of the needy. MATTHEW 6:1-4 (NIV) – “So when you give to the needy, do not announce it with trumpets, as the hypocrites do…to be honored by men…when you give to the needy, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing, so that your giving may be in secret…” This same passage from The Message: “Be especially careful when you are trying to be good so that you don't make a performance out of it. It might be good theater, but God…won't be applauding. When you do something for someone else, don't call attention to yourself. You've seen them in action – playactors…acting compassionate as long as someone is watching, playing to the crowds. They get applause…but that's all they get. When you help someone out, don't think about how it looks. Just do it - quietly and unobtrusively. That is the way your God, who conceived you in love, working behind the scenes, helps you out.”

Words must be accompanied with Actions! In JAMES 2:15-16, the question is asked: “If a brother or sister is poorly clothed and lacking in daily food, and one of you says to them, Go in peace, be warmed and filled, without giving them the things needed for the body, what good is that?” While our Government is caught up in its rhetoric and showing Dispassionate Disconnect, you can and should – as best you can - fill the vacuum and void with Compassionate Connection. Have wisdom and discernment as you distinguish between Need and Greed. Don’t be biased or profile others! Run the Risk of helping those with needs! Consider these things with me!
    Posted by peripheral on 2009-11-06 06:24:05 | Rating: | Views: 40
    Email This to a Friend            Print This Blog Post  

  Bookmark:
Permalink:  
   Blog Comments
  
Maybe I'm missing something here. Are you saying that the government spending is what Jesus would do but do it without making a big deal about it, or are you saying that tax payers paying taxes is what Jesus would do but do it without making a big deal about it?
Posted by  colinstmichael  on 2009-11-06 13:36:20 
  
My friend - I'm not saying either of those choices. Regardless of the Government and/or Taxes - followers of Christ ought to show compassion toward the needy and sacrificially - if need be - help to alleviate as much of that need as possible. When the New Testament was written, Theocracy was NOT the "in" thing - Persecution was! Taxes were exacted - but in spite of that (not because of it) - people were directed to look out for the welfare of each other. Without any implication of Financial Neutrality - The Book of Acts indicates that the people "pooled" their resources and everyone had everything in common. Ananias and Sapphira tried to compromise that early sharing principle (Acts 5) and God's Judgment struck them dead. This was not the Obama-Type redistribution of wealth - it was a voluntary and compassionate connection.
Posted by  peripheral  on 2009-11-06 16:46:47 
  
But that's the problem. They won't share and God won't smite them instantly like he did back in the day. Economists used to think the "Invisible Hand" would keep everything in check, and it didn't at all. People got greedy and would've capsized America if the government hadn't step in. It'd be nice if people could naturally conduct themselves in a *gasp* communist nature as they did in Acts, but far too many wealthy people enjoy holding wealth - not helping others. That's why they have to pitch in with taxes. You shouldn't be allowed to sit on a mountain of money while your neighbors go hungry. They don't get so much taken away in taxes that they can't also donate to charities. Many do but not enough.
Posted by  colinstmichael  on 2009-11-07 14:10:52 
Would you like to comment?

    (Maximum characters: 5000)
    You have characters left.
  Blog Information
 

peripheral
Alabama, United States

Latest Posts

 Supercilious Slogan
 When Leadership...
 The Faux Pas of the...
 Hubris and Absurdity...
 Political Perpetuity

peripheral's Links

 No links found

Blog Categories

 Nothing found

Blog Archive

 November 2009 (9)
 October 2009 (9)
 September 2009 (14)
 August 2009 (15)
 July 2009 (15)
 June 2009 (15)
 May 2009 (14)
 April 2009 (12)
 March 2009 (15)
 February 2009 (6)
 January 2009 (10)
 December 2008 (15)
 November 2008 (17)
 October 2008 (17)
 September 2008 (12)
 August 2008 (15)
 July 2008 (14)
 June 2008 (4)

Comment Archives

 November 2009 (7)
 October 2009 (5)
 September 2009 (1)
 August 2009 (15)
 July 2009 (20)
 June 2009 (2)
 April 2009 (1)
 March 2009 (4)
 January 2009 (1)
 December 2008 (1)
 November 2008 (2)
 October 2008 (4)
 September 2008 (1)
 August 2008 (1)

Page load time: 0.53450894355774 ms