Posted by
natalieaap
on 2008-02-07 15:14:06 |
 |
 |
|
 |
I am concerned with two things in this presidential election.
Votes being cast based on emotions and votes based on division tactics.
I am a Clinton supporter and I personally have a problem with the way Obama has been carrying out. He speaks of old politics and old government. Yet, he seeks endorsements from them. He seeks change but yet he does not have anything to prove that he can carry it on. Saying things and getting things done are two very different things. I do not think he can hold up in a general election based on only Iraq. He was not in the Senate at the time.
The campaign of another primary rival, Senator Chris Dodd of Connecticut - who also voted for the 2002 measure - drew attention to a New York Times story from July 2004, in which Obama said that while he would not have voted for the war, he was not in the Senate and privy to intelligence reports.
"What would I have done? I don't know," Obama said in the article. "What I know is that from my vantage point the case was not made." |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
Posted by
natalieaap
on 2008-02-07 15:28:51 |
|
|
|
|
You will find this quote on the following link:
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2007/10/ 03/obama_touts_initial_stance_on_iraq_war/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Posted by
HILLARYALLTHEWAY
on 2008-05-10 22:22:48 |
|
|
|
|
I AGREE WITH YOU IT'S EASY TO SAY YOU WOULD NOT HAVE VOTED FOR THE WAR WHEN YOU WERE NOT ASKED.I WONDER WHAT WENT ON IN INDIANA HILLARY WAS 15 POINTS AHEAD THEY DID'NT CALL IT OBAMAH HAD A JUDGE KEEP THE POLLS OPEN UNTILL HE WAS WITHIN 3 POINTS OF WINNING AND NOW THERE MAILING VOTES IN OREGON WHAT A CROOK
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |