Sign Up |  Login

     
 
    My Blog |  Popular Posts |  Top 100 Blogs |  Recent Blogs |  Random Blogs |  Write a Blog |  Manage Categories |  New Members |  Comments  
   View Blog
 
 And you think YOUR 2nd Amendment rights are safe ?
Chicago Gun Ban Case to Determine Gun Rights For All States

The U.S. Supreme Court announced that it will hear the case of McDonald v. City of Chicago, and decide whether the right to keep and bear arms secured by the Second Amendment protects Americans from overreaching state and local governments.

The Supreme Court case is of paramount importance to American citizens, to see that their constitutional rights are respected not only by the Congress, but by state and local governments.

Obama made public his CLEAR anti-gun agenda in March 2004 in Chicago. Obama voted against Illinois Senate Bill #2165, allowing citizens the right to protect themselves and for local ordinances against handgun possession. The measure passed the Illinois Senate by a vote of 38-20 without Obama's vote.

The Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) is bringing this case in cooperation with the Illinois State Rifle Association and the four local plaintiffs. I'm in this fight because a gun ban is no less onerous to civil rights in Chicago than it was in the District of Columbia.

At issue is a 27-year-old Chicago law banning handguns, requiring the annual taxation of firearms, and otherwise interfering with the right of law-abiding individuals to keep guns at home for self-defense. The case was brought on behalf of four Chicago residents, the Second Amendment Foundation, and the Illinois State Rifle Association.
Last year, in the landmark case of District of Columbia v. Heller, the Supreme Court held that the Second Amendment guarantees an individual right to keep and bear arms. However, as that case concerned the actions of the District of Columbia government, a federal entity, the high court was not called upon to decide whether the right bound states and local governments. Over the years, almost the entire Bill of Rights has been held to apply to state and local governments by incorporation of the Fourteenth Amendment.

The Chicago gun ban challenge will likely be among the most closely watched constitutional law cases in decades. At stake is not just the question of whether the Second Amendment secures the right to arms against state and local governments, but also the extent to which the Supreme Court preserves individual liberty against encroachment by state and local governments.


    Posted by mitchelljerry on 2009-10-19 18:58:10 | Rating: | Views: 63
    Email This to a Friend            Print This Blog Post  

  Bookmark:
Permalink:  
   Blog Comments
  
Just stumbled on your post and went back to read the others.

I think every freedom we have in this country is in jeopardy at this point.

If a country of supposedly educated people can elect a President whose ONLY qualification for office is that he has the ability to read well from a teleprompter, the future seems pretty bleek.

It's the first time in my life that I'm relieved to be closer to the end of my life than the beginning. The future, at this point, is frightening to think of.
Posted by  missingchristopher  on 2009-10-19 19:10:13 
  
That's how it is with thieves. Any excuse will do.
Posted by  GeorgesBlog  on 2009-10-19 20:02:16 
  
I think many people, especially the leaders in government have forgotten the last clause of the Second Amendment, which is not attached to any other ennumerated right withing the Bill of Rights, it states, "... the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed".

Would someone please give me the definition of "infringed", or for that matter please define "shall not"!

The rights of Americans have already been "infringed" in relation to the Second Amendment - many times!

The Second Amendment is the shortest and most direct of any of the individual rights, because it secures all the other rights contained therein. There is less room for interpretation in the Socond Amendment than any of the others because of that last clause!

- Thom

Posted by  Hugh_Pizmehoff  on 2009-10-19 21:03:33 
  
First, I wanted to thank you for your comments, secondly,the 8th Amendment is the shortest with only 16 words v. the 2nd with 27. I believe in a more educated and informed citizenry not subjects.
Posted by  mitchelljerry  on 2009-10-20 20:58:46 
  
American citizens will never give up their guns just because the government tells us to. Want our guns, Obama? Just send your g-men into our neighborhoods and try to collect them by force. We'll see the Power of the People. And OBama will see how powerless he really is. Our military will never turn against us. They are our sons and daughters, fathers, brothers and sisters. Obama will need his own army, a mass of followers dedicated only to him. Hmmmmm.

There is no ambiguity in the second amendment. The People will never sit idly by and allow the government to disarm us.
Posted by  JCWinters  on 2009-10-22 12:29:47 
  
ABSOLUTELY RIGHT!!!!!!
Posted by  mitchelljerry  on 2009-10-22 20:15:22 
  
I think Charlton Heston stated it perfectly "You can have my gun when you pry it from my cold, dead hands."
Posted by  tyschrupp  on 2009-11-02 23:11:17 
Would you like to comment?

    (Maximum characters: 5000)
    You have characters left.
  Blog Information
 

mitchelljerry
Minnesota, United States

Latest Posts

 SWALLOW
 INTERESTING INFO ABOUT...
 I THINK THESE FOLKS...
 LIBERAL GOTCHA !!!!!!!
 DON'T LET PC...

mitchelljerry's Links

 No links found

Blog Categories

 Nothing found

Blog Archive

 November 2009 (11)
 October 2009 (7)
 September 2009 (7)

Comment Archives

 November 2009 (13)
 October 2009 (4)

Page load time: 0.41362810134888 ms