Sign Up |  Login

     
 
    My Blog |  Popular Posts |  Top 100 Blogs |  Recent Blogs |  Random Blogs |  Write a Blog |  Manage Categories |  New Members |  Comments  
   View Blog
 
 Jim Carrey: misquoted or lost his friggin mind???
I just read the following piece on the Internet Movie Database this morning, and having physically WITNESSED Chicago comic and brilliant writer Greg Glienna editing his direct-to-video film/script, "Meet the Parents" back in 1991-1992, I'm astonished and incredibly annoyed to see Carrey quoted as saying he created the concept and characters while developing it with Steven Spielberg. (???) Perhaps he meant he created the concept of the sequel characters, the Fockers? But read the article below. The original writers of "Meet the Parents" were Greg Glienna and Mary Ruth Clark. There was a direct to video movie that starred Glienna and featured two other Chicago comics, the fabulous Emo Philips and the incredible Judy Tenuta.

So what the hell is Carrey talking about here? Or is he being misquoted and misunderstood, one hopes?

Here is the IMDB article that appeared this morning:

"Carrey Has 'No Regrets' Over Meet The Parents
16 December 2008 4:07 AM, PST


Hollywood funnyman Jim Carrey has no regrets after handing his role in 2000 movie Meet The Parents over to Ben Stiller.

The Ace Ventura star claims he created the original concept for the highly successful film and began developing the project with legendary director Steven Spielberg.

Carrey, who was due to take the lead role in the movie, and Spielberg, were both subsequently forced to drop out, citing scheduling commitments.

The part was then handed to Ben Stiller, who went on to make a hit sequel, Meet The Fockers, in 2004.

But Carrey insists he is glad he walked away from the project, because Stiller was much better suited to the role.

He tells U.S. talkshow host Larry King, "Meet the Parents was something that I was developing with Steven Spielberg. Yes. I actually created the Fockers in a creative meeting. Yes. But, it was perfect that Ben Stiller did it. When I saw it, I went 'That's the way it's supposed to be done'."

Yeah, note that underlined section...if they're saying he created the concept of "Meet the Parents", he didn't. Period. I'm surprised at IMDB for printing a story that's utter bullshit, and if what they meant to report was that Carrey created the concept of the Fockers sequel, they need to be specific in that and respect the ACTUAL original creators of the initial successful comedy.




    Posted by marathongal on 2008-12-16 12:10:40 | Rating: | Views: 45
    Email This to a Friend            Print This Blog Post  

  Bookmark:
Permalink:  
   Blog Comments
  
All issues involving creative origin in film making are very touchy, but the way I see it, Carey just needs to be more professional and avoid any creative claims he might have to the film.

I would never discuss such a touchy subject as that, if I were him.

Perhaps a misquote, perhaps indiscretion by Carey, but either way it made for some great comedy no matter what.
Posted by  Hugh_Pizmehoff  on 2008-12-16 12:44:00 
  
It's not really "touchy" in this case. It's simple. Two people in Chicago created and actually MADE this film back in 1992. It had nothing whatsoever to do with Kim Carrey, so he is either misquoted totally or blatantly lying. Either way, it's disrespectful to the actual creators.
Posted by  marathongal  on 2008-12-16 12:52:55 
  
Glad to see you're back! LOVE your new picture too.
Posted by  VegRunner  on 2008-12-16 18:47:40 
Would you like to comment?

    (Maximum characters: 5000)
    You have characters left.
  Blog Information
 

marathongal
California ( Southern), United States

Latest Posts

 reconnecting
 Blade Runner, why I...
 living asthanga...
 practice...and all is...
 the yin and the yang...

marathongal's Links

 No links found

Blog Categories

 Nothing found

Blog Archive

 September 2009 (3)
 August 2009 (6)
 July 2009 (3)
 June 2009 (1)
 May 2009 (8)
 April 2009 (11)
 March 2009 (15)
 February 2009 (2)
 January 2009 (3)
 December 2008 (3)
 November 2008 (1)
 October 2008 (14)
 September 2008 (15)
 August 2008 (24)
 July 2008 (17)
 June 2008 (18)
 November 2007 (16)
 October 2007 (3)

Comment Archives

 September 2009 (1)
 August 2009 (1)
 June 2009 (3)
 May 2009 (7)
 April 2009 (10)
 March 2009 (23)
 February 2009 (1)
 January 2009 (2)
 December 2008 (5)
 October 2008 (10)
 September 2008 (7)
 August 2008 (4)
 July 2008 (1)
 June 2008 (5)
 November 2007 (4)

Page load time: 0.44471287727356 ms