Sign Up |  Login

     
 
    My Blog |  Popular Posts |  Top 100 Blogs |  Recent Blogs |  Random Blogs |  Write a Blog |  Manage Categories |  New Members |  Comments  
   View Blog
 
 Tales from the Pitt- Pornography

 

 

Ou-la-la…Evenin' Kiddies, tonight's tail is about the industry of the flesh and all it's many, many enemies. Unfortunately for me, the delights of the skin have been, for some time now....out of my reach, he-he, so, I've asked a new ... friend of mind to weave this little tail, I hope you'll find his views just as... crypty.....

 

Hello meat-puppets. I want to play a game. The rules are simple, and the outcome is entirely in your hands.

For many of you, the idea of being regarded based on your appearance is appalling. Pornography at its most base is all about these appearances. But oh how appearances can be deceiving. 

Society prides itself of its moral and acceptable behaviors. A man who speaks in platitudes about women is called a misogynist. A woman who speaks in platitudes about men is called a liberator. I ask you this, what exactly is she liberating herself from?

Is it from being desired? From being wanted? From being called beautiful? Or perhaps she does not wish to wear makeup, sensual clothing, or paint her nails?


 

 


The history of female oppression is not in question here. Rather, it is the assumption that male sexuality is abhorrent and innately domineering. It is assumed that the graphic displays in pornography speak to only the basest and most hideous aspects of male sexuality.

But what of the basest, most hideous aspects of the female nature?

Are we to assume that objectifying women is worse than a woman’s need for compliments, for jewelry, for ‘intimacy’, for ‘emotional’ connection? Should wedding magazines, soap operas, talk-shows, emotional poetry, lipstick, stockings, and beauty products be discarded along with the box of porn? You may as well de-associate from that emotionally supportive male 'friend' of yours too if you are in a relationship; emotions are an aphrodisiac and constitute 'cheating' just the same as carnal knowledge.

Fantasy is an innate aspect of the human condition. As far as the modern world has come, with its equality and suffrage, and charity, is the next step, to ban the biological impulses from which our species originated? What will we become then, when we have driven out all those lustful desires, and animal-like impulses?

And now we come to our game.

If you are so opposed to being objectified and distain men from doing so, then, to help recovering ‘lust-addicted’ men, should not the modern woman dress in a burqa? Because I am sure none of you bat your eyes, giggle, and accentuate your feminity to garner some small measure of social advantage. 

How much easier it would be for men to judge a woman only on her ‘personality’ if she were entirely covered, except for her eyes... Is this not the logical next step in equality?


It is your choice: to live as an object, or to live as eyes...Either way, when the robes come off, your mate will still have lust in their own orbs, so perhaps a knife will be needed as well…

Make your choice.





Nite-nite lovelies.


Ou look, they all have such interesting personalities….  


Get a playlist! Standalone player Get Ringtones



 

    Posted by bloodintheeyes on 2009-11-03 15:09:20 | Rating: | Views: 84
    Email This to a Friend            Print This Blog Post  

  Bookmark:
Permalink:  
   Blog Comments
  
We all tend to play the game at one time or another. Human sexuality...some, the rigid and sexually deprived, want us to think sex and sexuality is sinful. I say, they just need to get laid...several times in a row.

I admit, I'll show cleavage if it will give me leverage...why not..What? You think tits are just for feeding hungry babies? I don't think so.

Good blog...very interesting effects...
Posted by  debbiestrange  on 2009-11-03 19:05:00 
  
Never used my cleavage for advantage. Apparently there are women who pay lots of money to get what I got honestly. I guess some would consider that waste.
Posted by  lynbarnes  on 2009-11-06 17:18:17 
  
thanks, and ... i agree, cleavage is a weapon of mass distraction.
Posted by  bloodintheeyes  on 2009-11-04 09:51:53 
  
I do believe, my dear Blood, that you have neglected the fact that men are also seen by women in a very animalistic way....at least initially. Perhaps nowadays it is not always the physical appearance of a man that drives a woman mad with desire (tho this is still a significant factor in many cases....::ahem::) - a result of what constitutes 'survival' in our society - but it is present all the same. Afterall, the whole point of being attracted to someone, in it's most primitive & instinctual form, is to perpetuate the existence of the human race thru procreation.

Back in the caveman days, the way it's still done in the animal kingdom, a suitable mate was one of large, athletic stature with ample hunting & protection abilities. The stronger, more attractive male who opportunely showcases his skills is the one who catches the female's attention a-la 'survival of the fittest'...stronger males (& females) produce stronger babies & so on...

So, in order to truly 'even out the playing field,' if women must refrain from trying to appear more physically attractive & don a burqa in lieu of 'lust-enhancing' clothes & makeup, then men must refrain from showing off their 'survival dexterity' in the way of that shiny new car, wad of cash, fancy cell phone & various other status symbols (expensive designer suits/clothes, watches/jewelry etc)
Posted by  foxx_flie  on 2009-11-05 10:48:14 
  
i agree, there are differences between important attraction signals between the sexes.

caveman example is good: two twin brothers, equally attractive, walk into the cave after the hunt, look exactly alike, only, one has a bigger dead animal (meat) in his hand, i'm sure the loincloth knickers would have been parted faster for that caveman over the other....heh-heh.

but anyway, blog was a defense against them that object to being called an object.

our cars, womens bodies, objectivication is a two way street.
Posted by  bloodintheeyes  on 2009-11-06 03:51:17 
  
::whew!:: i do believe that's the longest comment i've ever left 4 u....4 anyone! hahaha

anyway my bottom line was, i don't get why the focus is so intent on women being objectified when there is an underground-esque apotheosis of men in the way of social status

nice song btw...hahahaha
Posted by  foxx_flie  on 2009-11-05 10:53:19 
  
apotheosis <--actually had to look that up, a first on this site, shoulda
known it'd be somethin u said u waskally wabbit.
Posted by  bloodintheeyes  on 2009-11-06 03:47:12 
  
;)
Posted by  foxx_flie  on 2009-11-08 14:15:51 
  
Don't for get aside form cave paintings of epic hunts, "porn" is just about the oldest art form.
I always like to point out that the rather graphic images from the Taoist Pillow Books were selected by the woman and placed by the bed to instruct her lover in her expectations for the evening.
So, maintaining the notion that porn is just for men is being willfully ignorant of an obvious market with ample demographic research to prove it's existence.
I can see the exception that many women take to gang bang, bukkake, pony girl, or any of the wide variety of toilet based porn, hell some of that stuff makes me gag... I'm still traumatized by 2 girls 1 cup and it's been over a year since I saw it last. (all but the 1st we're under protest or by surprise, "Hey look at this." But to assume this is all there is, is like thinking every one who drinks or smokes a spliff does crystal meth the logic just isn't commutative.

Even I know better than to question a woman's logic so I'll stop here.
Posted by  Munkyman  on 2009-11-05 18:22:39 
  
gang bang, bukkake, pony girl, or any of the wide variety of toilet based porn
-thats like, the best kind. heh-heh
Posted by  bloodintheeyes  on 2009-11-06 03:45:16 
  
So, my issue isn't really with porn, just the shallowness of the human condition? I can buy that.
Posted by  lynbarnes  on 2009-11-06 17:16:25 
  
seems like it.
Posted by  bloodintheeyes  on 2009-11-06 18:02:46 
  
I like BDSM...

I like ninja'z too...

Don't like muslim girls:)

Ya Dokta:)
Posted by  yadokta  on 2009-11-11 16:56:29 
  
ha. muslim chicks are so hot though.
Posted by  bloodintheeyes  on 2009-11-11 22:47:39 
  
I disagree sooooooooooooooooooo much. There is a reason they wear the whole ninja thing. It's because they have nasty faces! Haven't you seen that girl from mortal combat!? Half of them are realy men! And they might have bombs strapped under the black blanket! No I do not agree with you atall! On that pic the one at the far left has man eyes! They remind me of the sand people from starwars! errh, rather you than me! And thats me saying that!

Ya Dokta!!!
Posted by  yadokta  on 2009-11-13 03:45:15 
  
This is a good link for ya:)

Ya Dokta:p

http://googtube.blogspot.com/2006/07/muslim-girls-g one-wild.html
Posted by  yadokta  on 2009-11-13 03:57:25 
Would you like to comment?

    (Maximum characters: 5000)
    You have characters left.
  Blog Information
 

bloodintheeyes
Underspecified, Afghanistan

Latest Posts

 Only One
 oy vey- I sprouted...
 what else really?...
 circle.you.just.dont.g...
 Tagged, again?!? What...

bloodintheeyes's Links

 No links found

Blog Categories

 lifes Epiphany's
 past thoughts
 peaces
 Poetyr
 secreats
 Tales From the PiTT
 treatises

Blog Archive

 November 2009 (9)
 October 2009 (10)
 September 2009 (8)
 August 2009 (7)
 December 2008 (5)
 November 2008 (5)
 October 2008 (11)
 September 2008 (10)
 August 2008 (12)
 July 2008 (11)
 June 2008 (5)
 May 2008 (4)

Comment Archives

 November 2009 (189)
 October 2009 (218)
 September 2009 (110)
 August 2009 (33)
 December 2008 (12)
 November 2008 (79)
 October 2008 (68)
 September 2008 (28)
 August 2008 (70)
 July 2008 (87)
 June 2008 (27)
 May 2008 (4)

   Bookmarked Bloggers
Evetspo...
View Blogs
lynbarnes
View Blogs
dreadna...
View Blogs
rallen2
View Blogs
Sarahzzzz
View Blogs
y_wait4_u
View Blogs
jloyola
View Blogs
AllThin...
View Blogs
yadokta
View Blogs
MyGalli...
View Blogs
foxx_flie
View Blogs
ArmyWif...
View Blogs
Staying...
View Blogs
pattern...
View Blogs
BootLady
View Blogs
allanst...
View Blogs
bravene...
View Blogs
Lalligal
View Blogs
swarnmriga
View Blogs
Nadya93
View Blogs
maggie8301
View Blogs
sucker4...
View Blogs
inthesu...
View Blogs
debbies...
View Blogs
geoffre...
View Blogs
thefantasy
View Blogs
justano...
View Blogs
greunie
View Blogs
a91Wcom...
View Blogs
dontfea...
View Blogs
shebox
View Blogs
bertisboss
View Blogs
Munkyman
View Blogs
havic_kidd
View Blogs
Faolin
View Blogs
weixiao...
View Blogs
Incessa...
View Blogs
colinst...
View Blogs
Cigaret...
View Blogs
GirlGirl
View Blogs
BrianH
View Blogs
peripheral
View Blogs
stonegate
View Blogs
wheatbread
View Blogs
   Bookmarked Posts
500 posts
Monday,...
PURE XTC
Theology
Don't...
The...
empty
Nobody...
Wow I...
For...
A blog...
Interne...
Let's...
Further...
stupidi...
Dear Wife
Atheist...
i am ugly
What is...
Water...
Light...
تاثÙ...
zero...
The...
Give Me...
GNU/Lin...
swarnmriga
some...
Here is...
Spammer...
Hello...
Advanta...
My Muse...
Anger /...
Death...
The Art...
The...
topolog...
Well,...
Scribbl...
dewdrop
My Beliefs
Jesus...
Trial...
I'm...
w/o JESUS
bunny...
I'm...
Page load time: 0.69626998901367 ms