| View Blog
|
|
| Why Dana White is Better than Vince McMahon
|
|
|
|
To start things off Dana has a much better approach to his sport, something that McMahon can only wish for. Only a few fighters has tested postively for steroids in the UFC, whereas in WWE many have died from it. White cares about his fighters and McMahon cares about the buck. If he cared about the WWE why didn't he stop if from becoming the snoozefest that it is today? Why did he continue to bore the world with repeat storylines? White basicly brought UFC/MMA back from the dead and made it the fastest going sport in the world, it left WWE with such bad ratings that McMahon has to give away money to garner attention - what a cheap way to get fans. In nothing less than 10 years White has done more for combat sports, more for fighters than McMahon did in 30 years for pro wrestling. Yes, WWE is a house hold name but thats what you get when you're on air for three decades, think where UFC will be in 30 years if they are seemingly the best now. Do you think kids with want to grow up idolising Cena or GSP, Undertaker or Anderson Silva, BJ Penn or Edge, Rampage Jackson or MVP?? While I do realise that WWE is staged and UFC is legit, I wonder why McMahon has allowed WWE to become a circus of dancing men, while UFC started becoming the face of combat. When comparing these two promoters you get one that has dedicated his life to developing the sport, who has sought to make it the best with or without competition. Then you got another, who makes dollars and has only now spent the time to the fix the wrong in his sport. In the next 10 years think which promoter will have reigned supreme and which sport will have established itself as the best? R.R
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| Views: 38
Email This to a Friend 
