Wait a minute! If an animal is so bad off health wise, then why isn't PETA sparing no expense to save it? Isn't it considered "ethical treatment" to provide life-saving veterinary care to a sick animal? PETA is a group that has the words "ethical treatment" in its name.

I guess you can call me ignorant, because I had no idea that PETA euthanized animals at all. I had this crazy notion that PETA cared for each and every animal on this planet. I know the Humane Society euthanizes animals, I know that the SPCA euthanizes too, but I didn't expect PETA to do this.

For example, PETA is an organization that protests the killing of chickens for human consumption. This is an organization that protests fishing, plain old fishing, arguing "fishing hurts".

Now I understand the truth about PETA. You see, they don't care about the welfare of any specific animal. They care about the ideology. They spend their money on the media campaigns, the lobbyists, and the protests. But ask them to spend $1,000.00 providing surgery to a sick dog, and they'll probably laugh at you. It's the politics they care about.

Next time you think about donating money to PETA, donate it to local rescue group instead.

This is obviously pasted of the internet, in summation there is a quote that goes, it is a poor country that threatens a mans freedom over his treatment of his livestock. Id like to ad a poorer country still that hosts the radical ideas of a wacko animal killing organization.